Why Are There So Many Different Reflexology Maps?
An Article By Lone Sorensen
A question that comes up frequently in reflexology training / practice is that of maps - why are there so many varying reflexology maps in circulation? This questions was answered comprehensively by Lone Sorensen, specialist in neuroscience reflex therapy, in a recent article that looks deep into the subject and provides the answers along with a fascinating comprehensive history of reflexology practice. I have reproduced it in full below, enjoy!
Mariga
Why Are There So Many Different
Reflexology Maps of Reflex Areas?
Article by Lone Sorensen, Specialist in Neuro Reflex Therapy
There are several reasons why many different maps exist for facial, hand, and foot
reflexology.
As the situation stands today, there is no standardized international education in
reflexology. This means that different schools and professional associations
around the world apply different methods – and therefore also different
experience-based mappings of reflex areas, such as:
The Historical Roots of Reflexology – A Global
Timeline
Egypt (ca. 2330 BC)
• Wall paintings in the tomb of Ankhmahor show treatment of hands and feet.
• Focus: practical experience and a holistic view (body, mind, spirit).
• Foundation: balance of life energy (Ka).
India (Ayurveda, ca. 1500 BC onwards)
• System of Marma points and Nadis.
• Foot massage (Padabhyanga) as a daily health practice.
• Foundation: balance of Prana and Doshas (Vata, Pitta, Kapha).
China (ca. 1000 BC onwards)
• Systematized knowledge of Qi, meridians, and acupuncture points.
• Feet and hands are seen as microsystems linked to internal organs.
• Foundation: yin/yang and the five elements.
North America (indigenous peoples, e.g., Cherokee, Navajo)
• Foot massage and pressure used in healing rituals.
• Feet regarded as direct contact with the earth’s energy.• Foundation: spiritual balance between human and nature.
South America (Inca and pre-Columbian cultures)
• Pressure and massage of hands/feet as part of healing practices.
• Feet regarded as a link to Pachamama (Mother Earth).
• Foundation: harmony between human, nature, and cosmos.
Africa (various tribes, ancient times)
• Pressure on hands and feet used in healing and rituals.
• Transmitted orally rather than documented.
• Foundation: strengthening life force and protection from disease spirits.
Japan & Southeast Asia (later traditions)
• Japan: shiatsu and anma massage, including hand and foot pressure.
• Thailand: foot massage rooted in both Ayurveda and Chinese medicine.
• Foundation: combination of prana, qi, and local practice.
Modern Developments of Facial and Scalp
Reflexology
Henry Head (UK, 1890s)
• Mapping of dermatomes confirmed that the body can “mirror itself” in
specific areas.
• Provided a neurological explanation for why stimulation of skin and points
can affect organs and the nervous system.
• Dermatomes remain fundamental in medicine, neurology, and
physiotherapy – and form a scientific bridge to reflexology theory.
William H. Fitzgerald (USA, 1872–1942)
• Physician and founder of “Zone Therapy.”• Worked with longitudinal zones of the body and pain relief through pressure
in nasal cavity, palate, toes, and fingers.
• Laid the foundation for modern reflexology, though without specific facial
maps.
Paul Nogier (France, 1950s)
• Developed auriculotherapy – the ear as a microsystem with the entire body
reflected in an “inverted fetus.”
• Created the RAC pulse for precise diagnostics.
Auriculotherapy – Two Traditions
• Nogier (France, 1950s): founder of Western auriculotherapy. Mapped the
ear as an inverted fetus microsystem. Developed the RAC pulse. Focus on
neurological reflex connections. Recognized by WHO in 1987.
• Chinese auriculotherapy (TCM, 1950s onwards): inspired by Nogier’s
work but adapted to Traditional Chinese Medicine. Ear points interpreted
through meridian theory, yin/yang, and the five elements. Strongly
integrated into the TCM system.
In summary:
• Nogier = reflex- and neurophysiology-based.
• China = energy- and meridian-based.
Bùi Quôc Châu (Vietnam, 1970s–80s)
• Developed Dien Chan, a detailed system of points and facial reflex maps.
• Based on the observation that the body can be reflected multiple times in
the face.
• Uses tools as well as manual techniques.
Toshikatsu Yamamoto (Japan, 1973)
• Introduced YNSA (Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture).
• The scalp mapped as a microsystem of the entire body.
• Often used in combination with other facial and ear-based systems.
Lone Sorensen (Denmark/Spain, from 1978, formalized 1988)
• Created Facial Reflex Therapy Sorensensistem™
.
• Integrates neurology, embryology, and multiple microsystems (face, hands,
feet, ears, skull).
• One of the world’s most comprehensive facial reflex therapy systems,
applied both therapeutically and in education globally.
Method Lone Sorensen integrating Traditional Tibetan Medicine (Sowa Rigpa)
• Tibetan medicine is a holistic healing tradition with roots dating back over
4000 years in Tibet and the Himalayan region.
• The theory is based on the balance between three life principles
energy/nerve signals, metabolism/consciousness and digestion/structure.
Tibetan medicine / Praxis Vertebralis appears as a modern interpretation or
revitalization – inspired by Tibetan philosophy.
This method focuses on spinal nerves and neurological connections to the
inner body/skin surface.
The method is theoretically based on the importance of spinal nerves for
the body's function – and suggests a historical continuum from Tibet to
modern chiropractic.
Hand Reflexology – Modern Systems
Korean Hand Therapy (Tae-Woo Yoo, 1970s, Korea)
• Created by Professor Tae-Woo Yoo.
• The entire body projected into the hands – each finger and palm area
corresponding to specific organs and functions.
• Uses pressure, small needles, magnets, and heat.
• Highly precise microsystem, widely used in Korea and internationally.
Sujok Therapy (Park Jae Woo, 1980s, Korea)
• An expansion and internationalization of Korean hand and foot reflexology.
• “Su” = hand, “Jok” = foot.
• Includes not only reflexology but also energy techniques, color therapy,
acupuncture, and magnet therapy.
• Particularly popular in India, Russia, and Eastern Europe.
Arco Terapia (Maria Perez, Argentina, 1980s)
• Developed by therapist Maria Perez.
• A unique hand reflexology system mapping the body in the “arches” of the
hands.
• Based on observations of how certain hand areas reflect organs and
emotional states.
• Practiced mainly in South America, often in combination with other reflex
methods.Lone Sorensen (Denmark/Spain, 1990s onwards)
• Built upon Maria Perez’s Arco Terapia.
• Developed a comprehensive hand reflexology system mapping organs,
hormonal balance, and emotional states in the hands.
• Integrates Arco Terapia with experiences from facial, foot neuro-
reflexology.
• Today, one of the world’s most comprehensive hand reflexology systems,
used both therapeutically and in education.
Why So Many Different Maps Exist
Looking at the history of reflexology – from ancient cultures in Egypt, India, and
China to modern developments such as auriculotherapy, facial reflexology, and
hand reflexology – it becomes clear why so many different maps exist.
Each culture and researcher have observed the body through their own
perspective:
• Egyptians: holistic view of life energy (Ka).
• Indians: Ayurveda with marma points and prana.
• Chinese: meridians, yin/yang, and the five elements.
• Neurologists such as Henry Head and Fitzgerald: scientific observations of
the nervous system.
• Modern pioneers such as Nogier, Bùi Quôc Châu, Yamamoto, Maria Perez,
and Lone Sorensen: new microsystems and integration of both traditional
knowledge and modern neurology.
Thus, the maps reflect:
1. 2. 3. Cultural foundations (spiritual, energetic, neurological/medical).
Practical experience and observations, where therapists discovered
correlations between areas and functions.
Scientific findings that confirm and expand understanding (e.g.,
dermatomes).
Conclusion: There is not one “correct” map but many valid mappings, each
representing different entry points to the same reality: the body’s ability to mirror
itself in microsystems.On the Variety of Maps in Circulation
Reflexology today includes many maps of the hands, feet, face, ears, and scalp.
Many are well-founded in cultural tradition, practical experience, or scientific
research – such as Ayurveda, Chinese medicine, Henry Head, Fitzgerald, Nogier,
or newer pioneers like Bùi Quôc Châu and Lone Sorensen.
At the same time, there are maps created without any real basis, often by copying
existing systems and altering point placement to appear original. These are not
grounded in history, clinical practice, or neurological research and should be
approached critically.
It is important for both therapists and students to distinguish between:
• Serious mappings: developed through long-term observation, extensive
experience, and/or research.
• Superficial copies: produced to appear different, but without scientific or
experiential foundation.
How Reflex Areas and Microsystems Arise
When we speak of reflex areas or “referred zones” on hands, feet, face, and ears,
we describe the body’s ability to project itself into smaller regions.
This phenomenon can be explained through neurological principles:
1. Dermatomes and the nervous system
• The skin is supplied by specific spinal nerves (dermatomes, Henry Head).
• When an internal organ is affected, pain, tenderness, or skin changes may
appear in the corresponding dermatome.
• These “referred zones” are neurological reflections of organ function.
2. Convergence in the central nervous system
• Nerve impulses from skin, muscles, and organs meet in the same
spinal/brain segment.
• The brain can “confuse” these signals, so a problem in an organ is felt in
the skin (referred pain).
• This principle also makes it possible to influence organs by stimulating the
skin zones.3. Development of microsystems
• Because the nervous system works segmentally, the whole body can
“mirror” itself in small regions like hands, feet, face, and ears.
• Each microsystem acts as a neurological mirror.
4. Neuroplasticity and healing
• Repeated stimulation of reflex areas can activate brain plasticity – the
ability to form new neural connections.
• Microsystem therapy can thus not only relieve symptoms but also support
rehabilitation and regulation of body functions.
Why Multiple Reflex Areas Exist for the Same
Structure
Each spinal nerve branches into thousands of endings that reach different tissue
layers – skin, fascia, muscle, organs. This means that the same organ can be
represented in several areas of the body.
• Many branches: one spinal nerve sends signals to thousands of nerve
endings across tissues.
• Different receptors: mechanoreceptors, nociceptors, proprioceptors are
distributed in skin, fascia, muscles, organs.
• Different functions: because receptors detect different stimuli (pressure,
stretch, pain, temperature), an organ can be mirrored differently depending
on the tissue layer.
• Multiple reflex zones: the same organ can thus be represented in multiple
microsystems with varying functions and sensitivities.
• Practical consequence: e.g., the liver can be stimulated from foot, hand,
face, or ear – with different effects, as different receptors and tissues are
activated.
Conclusion: Multiple reflex areas for the same structure exist due to branching
spinal nerves and the distribution of receptors across tissue layers. This makes the
system complex but rich in therapeutic possibilities.
Explanation of Different Microsystem Frameworks
1. Microsystems in relation to Meridian Theory (TCM)
• In Chinese medicine, the body is traversed by meridians carrying Qi.
• Reflex areas on foot, hand, ear, or face are often seen as projections of
these pathways.
• The same organ can be represented in multiple microsystems depending
on where the meridian is closest to the surface.
• Example: the liver appears on the medial side of the foot (liver meridian)
and in the facial zone around the eyes (functional connection).
Thus, meridian theory provides an energetic explanation for why different
microsystem maps may indicate the same structure.
2. Microsystems in relation to Chakra / Nerve Plexus Theory
• In Indian tradition (Ayurveda), seven chakras correspond to the body’s major
nerve plexuses.
• Chakras are energetic centers with clear anatomical parallels (e.g., solar
plexus, cardiac plexus, sacral plexus).
• Reflex areas can be seen as projections of these energy centers/plexuses.
• A microsystem map may show the same organ in different ways depending
on whether it is viewed through:-the energetic axis (chakra/plexus), or
-the segmental neurology (dermatomes/spinal nerves).
Thus, overlaps arise between maps – one lens energetic, the other
neurological.
Conclusion
Meridian theory explains microsystems through energetic pathways and organ connections. Chakra/plexus theory explains them through major nerve networks and their link to both physiology and energy.
____________________________________________________________________________
In modern Reflexology, these perspectives converge: one can work on
microsystems in the skin while understanding them both energetically and
neurologically.
This overview is intended to provide deeper insight into how reflex areas and
microsystems have arisen – through historical traditions, modern observations,
and neurological principles.
I chose to call my methods Neuro Reflexology because they are based on
systems with scientific research behind them, including:
• Dr. Toshikatsu Yamamoto (YNSA), Japan
• Dr. Castillo Morales, Argentina
• Dr. Wong, USA
• Dr. Bùi Quôc Châu, Vietnam
• Maria Perez, Argentina
• Dr. J. Bossy, France
By integrating and further developing these methods, a comprehensive system has
been created that unites the best of different traditions and modern neurology.
This also explains why these methods should often be combined in treatment – to
open multiple entry points to the body’s healing potential.
Lone Sorensen
Specialist in Neuro Reflex Therapy
International Institute of Neuro Reflexology, Barcelona, Spain
Contact
10A Redmond Square,
Wexford,
Ireland,
Y35KX28.
Ph: 086 382 3608

